<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strategy for Facebook and Local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephenespinosa.com/the-strategy-for-facebook-and-local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephenespinosa.com/the-strategy-for-facebook-and-local/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Bliss</title>
		<link>http://stephenespinosa.com/the-strategy-for-facebook-and-local/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenespinosa.com/?p=10#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Steve,
thanks and though I agree with David above Brilliant post, I had to temper my enthusiasm.
Just because they should, they could, and wouldnt it be cool if they did, this is still more &quot;What if&quot; than &quot;How to&quot;.
translating the data of huge volume to be applicable for the little guy would definitely be cool and now im thinking why HAVENT facebook and Google done this yet?
True Google does have a fair amount of instruction, data and tutorials to help the smaller advertiser along, but most still feel pretty confused when trying to implement the platform.

I see More local on facebook recently but maybe thats just because ive been more alert looking for it.
Still most of the local advertisers on fb are wasting their spend by failing to use the geotagteting and demographic targeting that IS available.
(lately Ive seen  realtors hawking locations in states 1000 miles away, dentists too)

I do differ on the idea that the small budget advertiser doesent know their demographic as well as the big guns.
most often the big guns have such scatter gun product lines they aim for diversity while most of the small businesses I work with know their ideal customer very well, especially if pressed to really identify and describe them.
Still your point is valid that the data facebook (and google ) has would be even more valuable if it was more clearly shared with the advertisers for optimal targeting and testing.
thanks for your insight, im glad i followed Davids link over here.
thanks and take care,
Bryan Bliss

 ps. also glad to find another Sox fan on twitter ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
thanks and though I agree with David above Brilliant post, I had to temper my enthusiasm.<br />
Just because they should, they could, and wouldnt it be cool if they did, this is still more &#8220;What if&#8221; than &#8220;How to&#8221;.<br />
translating the data of huge volume to be applicable for the little guy would definitely be cool and now im thinking why HAVENT facebook and Google done this yet?<br />
True Google does have a fair amount of instruction, data and tutorials to help the smaller advertiser along, but most still feel pretty confused when trying to implement the platform.</p>
<p>I see More local on facebook recently but maybe thats just because ive been more alert looking for it.<br />
Still most of the local advertisers on fb are wasting their spend by failing to use the geotagteting and demographic targeting that IS available.<br />
(lately Ive seen  realtors hawking locations in states 1000 miles away, dentists too)</p>
<p>I do differ on the idea that the small budget advertiser doesent know their demographic as well as the big guns.<br />
most often the big guns have such scatter gun product lines they aim for diversity while most of the small businesses I work with know their ideal customer very well, especially if pressed to really identify and describe them.<br />
Still your point is valid that the data facebook (and google ) has would be even more valuable if it was more clearly shared with the advertisers for optimal targeting and testing.<br />
thanks for your insight, im glad i followed Davids link over here.<br />
thanks and take care,<br />
Bryan Bliss</p>
<p> ps. also glad to find another Sox fan on twitter <img src='http://stephenespinosa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strategy for Facebook and Local « Stephen Espinosa &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://stephenespinosa.com/the-strategy-for-facebook-and-local/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strategy for Facebook and Local « Stephen Espinosa &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenespinosa.com/?p=10#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] post: The Strategy for Facebook and Local « Stephen Espinosa   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: The Strategy for Facebook and Local « Stephen Espinosa   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mihm</title>
		<link>http://stephenespinosa.com/the-strategy-for-facebook-and-local/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mihm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenespinosa.com/?p=10#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Brilliant post, Steve.  It would be nice to see FB step into Local, and especially as an easy self-service advertising play for SMB&#039;s as you suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant post, Steve.  It would be nice to see FB step into Local, and especially as an easy self-service advertising play for SMB&#8217;s as you suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
